How to Keep Building Your Pipeline When the Obvious Opportunities Feel Exhausted

There's a moment that most trust fundraisers recognise.

You've done the research. You've worked through the obvious prospects. You've applied to the funders that seemed like a natural fit, and now, looking at your pipeline, it feels thin. Like you've reached the edges of what's available to you.

It's a really common feeling, particularly as our potential pool of funders is narrowing. But a thinning pipeline can, in my experience, mean different things for different organisations.

For some, it genuinely does signal that they've reached their natural trust limit for now. The landscape has changed, the funder pool in their cause area has contracted, and the uncomfortable truth is that perhaps trust fundraising can only deliver so much in the current climate.

But for others, and this is more common than people realise, it means they've worked through the most visible prospects and hit some natural limits on the obvious research. Which is a very different problem and a much more solvable one!

So before you conclude that your pipeline building is exhausted, ask which of those two situations you're actually in.

Have you really exhausted it, or does it just feel that way?

When you're a small team wearing many hats, deep prospect research often loses out to writing the actual applications. That's absolutely not a criticism; it's the reality of working in trust fundraising with limited support.

But it does mean that the research most of us have done is weighted towards the obvious. The well-known foundations. The trusts that come up first in a database search. The funders that everyone in your cause area already knows about.

Going deeper, and going sideways, often reveals prospects that aren't in that first layer.

Look sideways: prospect research beyond your cause area

One of the most useful reframes in trust fundraising prospecting is to stop thinking only about your primary cause area and start mapping all the legitimate angles your organisation has.

The communities you serve. The geography you work in. The methods you use. The populations you reach.

A trust that wouldn't fund you as a specialist provider of X might absolutely fund you as an organisation serving Y community, or working in Z place, or using a particular approach that aligns with their priorities.

Map those angles and research funders for each one separately, not just for your primary cause. This is where a good mind-map comes in handy!

Don't overlook smaller and newer trusts

A lot of prospect research focuses on the established, well-known foundations. They're easier to find, better documented and feel like safer bets.

But smaller family trusts and recently established foundations can be less competitive, more flexible and more open to the kind of relationship-based approach that works well for organisations with a strong story to tell.

The Charity Commission is your best friend here: searchable by multiple filters, free to use and often overlooked as a prospecting tool in its own right. 360Giving data, local community foundation networks and the GRIN database all add to the picture.

You don't need to pay for a database of funders. The Charity Commission is a goldmine of potentials, but those choices are determined by the time you have for deep research and your budget. For me, asking an external resource (like us!) to pull together a potential pipeline for you is a huge time saver and helps you to hit the ground running, particularly if your organisation is new to trust fundraising.

The hospice and larger charity challenge

For hospices and larger charities navigating income thresholds, the £1m, £5m or £10m expenditure limits that often exclude you from funders you'd otherwise be well aligned with, the answer is rarely to find more funders.

It's to go deeper with the right ones. Remember quality over volume. If you have some great potentials or existing funders in your pipeline, those are the ones to steward and build relationships with.

If you're just starting out, do your research carefully. Some funders have more flexibility than their guidelines suggest. A warm conversation before you apply can sometimes reveal doors that aren't visible from the outside. This is also where network mapping, and looking for close connections with your organisation, can open those invisible doors!

Quality and alignment over volume, always

To say it again: a long pipeline is no longer the goal in trust fundraising.

20 to 30 genuinely well-aligned prospects, ones where you've checked the fit carefully, where you can see a real case for support, where there's a relationship to build or already being built, is a far stronger starting point than a list of 50 possibilities that looked promising in an initial database search.

Those "General Charitable Purposes" trusts that sit in so many pipelines? Unless their accounts show they're actively supporting organisations like yours, question seriously whether they earn their place. Time spent chasing a poor fit is time not spent nurturing a potentially strong one.

Network mapping in trust fundraising, finding the warm way in

One of the most underused prospecting tools in trust fundraising is the network that already exists around your organisation. Your trustees. Your patrons. Your senior leadership team. Your major donors. Your volunteers. Your corporate partners.

Who do they know? Are there connections to the trustees of funders you're targeting? Are there introductions that could be made? Are there people in your network who could open a door that cold research never would?

Network mapping, systematically working through the connections around your organisation to find warm routes into funder relationships, takes time. But a warm introduction does more than almost any other prospecting tool, in a landscape where funders increasingly fund organisations they know and trust.

Your pipeline as a thinking tool

A well-built pipeline isn't just a list of prospects and deadlines. It's a map of your relationships: where you are with each funder, what the next action is, when you last made contact, what stewardship is planned.

When prospecting feels exhausted, looking at your pipeline as a thinking tool rather than just a financial forecast can often reveal opportunities that were already there but haven't yet been developed. Relationships that went quiet and could be warmed back up. Funders you applied to years ago and never got a response from. Closely aligned prospects where the relationship building hasn't been started.

Sometimes the answer to "where do we find new prospects?" isn't new prospects at all. It's going deeper with the ones you already have.

The honest answer

Then there's the answer that's sometimes really hard to hear.

If you've genuinely done all of the above, looked sideways, explored smaller trusts, network mapped, gone deeper with existing relationships, checked alignment carefully, and the pipeline still feels stagnant, it might be that your organisation has reached its natural trust limit for now.

That's absolutely not a failure on your part. It's information.

The trust landscape has changed significantly. For some cause areas, health and the arts in particular, the funder pool has contracted even as existing funders have grown. Competition has intensified. AI has increased application volumes without increasing the grants available.

In that context, a robust multi-layered fundraising strategy, one where trust fundraising plays its rightful part alongside other income streams rather than being asked to gap fill for income lost elsewhere, is what gives organisations the resilience to navigate a tougher landscape.

Trusts are still brilliant. They should absolutely be part of your strategy, but they work best as one strand of a well-developed income mix, not as the sole solution to every funding gap.

One last thing

Prospecting isn't just research. It's relationships, and relationships take time to build: the warm introductions, the conversations at meet the funder events, the expression of interest emails that say "I've been following your work, and I think we might be aligned".

The organisations I see building the most sustainable pipelines aren't necessarily the ones doing the most research or holding the biggest pipelines of opportunities. They're the ones being most intentional about who they're building relationships with and why.

That intentionality is what makes the difference.


Let us build the pipeline for you

Deep prospect research is usually the first thing to go when you are writing applications as well. We build trust pipelines for charities every week, which means you start with a researched, aligned list rather than a blank spreadsheet. Book a discovery call and tell us where your pipeline has got to.

Next
Next

Why Systems Matter as Much as Major Donor Relationships